Barack Obama's state of the union light on grand strategy
Rosa Brooks makes some perceptive comments above regarding what foreign policy content there was in President Obama's state of the union address.
Christopher Preble didn't like the invocation of America as "the indispensible nation":
'Have we learned nothing in the past decade? Have we learned anything? To say that we are the indispensable nation is to say that nothing in the world happens without the United Statesâ?? say so. That is demonstrably false.Of course, the United States of American is an important nation, the most important, even. Yes, we are an exceptional nation. We boast an immensely powerful military, a still-dynamic economy (in spite of our recent challenges), and a vibrant political culture that hundreds of millions of people around the world would like to emulate. But the world is simply too vast, too complex, and the scale of transactions in the global economy is enormous. It is the height of arrogance and folly for any country to claim indispensability.
The president is hardly alone, however. Many in Washingtonâ??including some of his most vociferous critics in the Republican Partyâ?? celebrate the continuity in U.S. foreign policy as an affirmation of its wisdom. The presidentâ??s invocation of the â??indispensable nationâ? line from the mid-1990s is merely the latest manifestation of a foreign policy consensus that has held for decades.
But the world has changed, and is still changing. Our grand strategy needs to adapt. When we embarked on the unipolar project after the end of the Cold War, the United States accounted for about a third of global economic output, and a third of global military expenditures; today, we account for just under half of global military spending, but our share of the global economy has fallen below 25 percent.
'
It's like U.S. foreign policy rhetoric is an exercise in Stuart Smalley-esque self-esteem building.