Papism

By

The roots of Chechen terrorism

Alex Alexiev writes in National Review about the wave of Russian terror:

'As clear-cut a case of Islamist barbarism as it is, though, it is difficult to make sense of the spiraling violence in Russia without reference to Vladimir Putinâ??s disastrous anti-terrorism policies.

Unlike his predecessor, Boris Yeltsin, President Putin from the very beginning of his tenure in the Kremlin showed himself completely unwilling to consider any negotiated settlement with the Chechens and pursued a strictly military solution and a puppet regime in Grozny instead -- an attitude characterized by his vulgar promise to the resistance to â??rub them out in the latrine.â? He had no interest in exploring let alone exploiting the deep gulf between the resistanceâ??s hard-line, Saudi-supported Islamists and its secular nationalists, who had little in common except their vehement dislike of Moscowâ??s heavy-handed domination.

'

Could it be that National Review has succumbed to Papism? Or is realism only useful when it can be used to criticize Russia?

View Comments

you might also like
Turkey Finds Itself on the Defensive in Syria
Situated in northwestern Syria, Idlib province is the last major rebel-held area that isn't directly protected by Turkey or the United...
Popular In the Community
Load more...