Obama's Afghan dishonesty
Peter Beinart dings President Obama for failing to level with the American people about the consequences of a U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan:
Even if we stayed for 20 years, building a government that can stand on its own might be beyond our capacity. Weâ??d go broke trying, and there is little reason to believe the future of this Afghan government is vital to U.S. security. Barack Obama didnâ??t even say so in his speech.But Obama did imply that his administrationâ??s surge has so weakened the Taliban that theyâ??ll trade their weapons for negotiations and eventually join the current government, thus allowing the U.S. to leave an Afghanistan headed towards peace. Thatâ??s what Mr. Amini was disputing. Thereâ??s an honest way to advocate for withdrawal from Afghanistan and a dishonest way. The dishonest way is to suggest that weâ??ll leave behind a government that can secure the country and a political process than can end the war. The honest way is to acknowledge that the Afghanistan we leave behind will be a chaotic, ugly place where the Taliban rules large swaths of the country, and much of what we have built may be washed away.
That's a winning message to take into 2012, isn't it?
But seriously, spinning the U.S. withdrawal doesn't make a lot of sense. I suspect most Americans understand that the U.S. will leave Afghanistan much as we found it - at war with itself.
(AP Photo)
