Did Obama botch Egypt?
Niall Ferguson isn't impressed with President Obama's handling of Egypt:
The president has alienated everybody: not only Mubarakâ??s cronies in the military, but also the youthful crowds in the streets of Cairo. Whoever ultimately wins, Obama loses. And the alienation doesnâ??t end there. Americaâ??s two closest friends in the regionâ??Israel and Saudi Arabiaâ??are both disgusted. The Saudis, who dread all manifestations of revolution, are appalled at Washingtonâ??s failure to resolutely prop up Mubarak. The Israelis, meanwhile, are dismayed by the administrationâ??s apparent cluelessness.Last week, while other commentators ran around Cairoâ??s Tahrir Square, hyperventilating about what they saw as an Arab 1989, I flew to Tel Aviv for the annual Herzliya security conference. The consensus among the assembled experts on the Middle East? A colossal failure of American foreign policy.
I'm not clear why Ferguson is citing Saudi Arabia and Israel here. Ferguson insists in the piece that Obama should have jumped into the Egyptian revolt on the side of the protesters and the democratic wave - which is the antithesis of what both the Israelis and the Saudis wanted.
I do agree with Ferguson that no matter who "wins" in Egypt, Obama is the ultimate "loser" since the basic presumption appears to be that the president of the United States is omniscient and omnipotent - and that any outcome in another country that fails to satisfy our desires is naturally his fault.
(AP Photo)
